Home/Capabilities/Injection molding

Capability

Injection molding

Production molding runs from a tool you already own or one we build for you. Quotes cover the part, the tool, and the lead time separately so you can see what you are paying for.

SpecificationsPending sign-off
Press tonnage range25 to 3,000 tons (owned fleet)
Maximum shot weight8 kg owned; to 15 kg via partner presses
Tightest tolerance held±0.05 mm on critical features, CMM-verified; ±0.1 mm typical; uncalled dimensions to DIN 16742
Materials run in houseABS, PC, PC-ABS, PP, PA6, PA66, PA-GF30, POM, PBT, PBT-GF, PMMA, TPE, TPU. Further grades on request
Minimum order quantityNo contractual MOQ. Minimum economic run typically 500 pieces; below that we quote CNC or 3D printing instead
Typical lead time, first article4 to 8 weeks for new tooling, by tool class and complexity; 3 working days from PO on existing tooling

How this works

Injection molding forces molten polymer into a closed steel or aluminum tool under pressure, holds it while it cools, then ejects the part. The tool is the capital cost; once it exists, each part costs very little. That single fact governs every decision on this page.

A quote from us separates three numbers: the tool, the per-part price at the volumes you name, and the lead time to first article. Bundling them hides which one you are actually paying for.

hopper reciprocating screw nozzle sprue cavity parting line ejector pins clamp force fixed halfmoving half Machine and mold

Pellets melt in the barrel as the screw turns and shears them. The screw then moves forward as a plunger and pushes the shot through the nozzle, down the sprue and into the cavity. Clamp force holds the two halves shut against injection pressure. Once the part is rigid the mold opens on the parting line and ejector pins push it off the core.

When molding is the right process

Molding pays back when the tool cost divides across enough parts to beat the per-part cost of machining or printing. The crossover depends on part size and complexity, but the shape of the decision is consistent.

  • Under roughly 100 parts, printing or machining is almost always cheaper, because no tool has to be paid for.
  • Between roughly 100 and 1,000 parts, a prototype aluminum tool often wins, since it costs a fraction of production steel and runs the volumes needed.
  • Above roughly 1,000 parts a year, production tooling usually wins outright, and the gap widens with every part.
  • Volume is not the only trigger. Molding is also the right answer when you need a specific resin, a cosmetic finish, living hinges, or overmolded assemblies that no other process produces.

Tooling options

The tool type follows the part and the volume. A tool sized for 500 parts and a tool sized for 500,000 are different objects with different steels, different cooling, and a tenfold cost difference.

Tool typeTypical useTrade-off
Prototype aluminumBridge volumes, design validation, 100 to 5,000 partsLowest cost and fastest to cut. Softer, so tool life is limited and textures are restricted.
Production steel, single cavity1,000 to 100,000 parts a yearLong tool life, good finish. One part per cycle, so cycle time drives unit cost.
Multi-cavityHigh volume where unit cost dominatesSeveral parts per shot cuts unit cost sharply. Higher tool cost and cavity-to-cavity variation must be managed.
Family toolSeveral different parts of one assemblyOne tool instead of several. Flow balancing is harder and you cannot run parts in different ratios.
Hot runnerHigh volume, no runner scrapEliminates runner waste and shortens cycles. Higher tool cost and more maintenance.
Insert moldingMetal inserts, threads, terminals, magnetsOne shot. Inserts are loaded into the tool before it closes, so cycle time rises with the loading operation but tool cost stays close to a standard tool.
OvermoldingSoft-touch grips, seals, hard-on-hard multi-material partsTwo shots, either on a two-shot press with a rotating platen or by robot transfer between tools. Tool cost roughly doubles. Below tens of thousands a year, insert overmolding on two simpler tools usually wins on total cost.
aluminum, single cavity fast to cut, tens of thousands of shots hardened steel, four cavities four parts a shot, millions of shots cavity count divides cycle time; it does not divide tool cost Tool options

A single cavity aluminum tool is cut in a fraction of the time and is the right answer while a design is still moving. A multi-cavity hardened tool costs more than the cavity count suggests, because every cavity has to be balanced and matched, but it divides the cycle time across four parts and it will outlive the program.

Materials

Resin choice sets the mechanical performance, the shrinkage, the cycle time, and often the tolerance you can hold. Specify the grade, not just the family: PA66 unfilled and PA66-GF30 shrink differently and cannot share a tool without a change.

Commodity resins

MaterialChosen for
ABSGeneral purpose housings and enclosures. Easy to mold, paints and plates well. Degrades under UV, so outdoors it is replaced by ASA, or by PC-ABS with a UV stabilizer package as used on automotive exteriors.
PPLiving hinges, chemical resistance, low cost. High shrinkage, so tolerances are looser.
PE (HDPE, LDPE)Containers, chemical resistance, low friction. Difficult to bond or paint.
PS and HIPSLow cost rigid parts and packaging. Brittle, poor chemical resistance.
PMMA (acrylic)Optical clarity, lenses, light pipes. Brittle and notch sensitive.

Engineering resins

MaterialChosen for
PCImpact strength and clarity. Notch sensitive, so avoid sharp internal corners. Needs drying before molding.
PC-ABSBalance of PC toughness and ABS processability. Common for enclosures that must survive a drop.
PA6 and PA66Strength, wear, and temperature resistance. Absorbs moisture, which moves dimensions after molding.
PA-GF30Glass filled nylon for structural parts. Much stiffer, but anisotropic shrinkage and abrasive to tools.
POM (acetal)Low friction and dimensional stability for gears and bearings. Narrow processing window.
PBT and PBT-GFElectrical parts, connectors. Good dielectric properties and dimensional stability.
TPE and TPUOvermolded grips, seals, and flexible parts. Bond compatibility with the substrate must be checked.

High-performance resins

MaterialChosen for
PEEKContinuous high temperature and chemical resistance. Cost per kilo decides most inquiries.
PEI (Ultem)High temperature with inherent UL94 V-0 flame retardance and no additives.
PPSChemical and temperature resistance for under-bonnet and fluid-handling parts.
PSURepeated steam autoclaving, medical and lab equipment.

Reading a grade code

A resin is specified by grade, not by family, and the suffix carries the information that decides whether the part works. GF or GB with a number is glass fiber or bead content by weight, so PA66-GF30 is thirty percent glass. MD is mineral filler, TD talc. V0 and HB are UL 94 flammability ratings, V-0 being the self-extinguishing one that mains-powered enclosures usually need. FR means a flame retardant package is present, which usually costs some impact strength. UV is a light stabilizer package. HI is high impact, MFI or a melt flow number tells you how easily it fills a thin wall.

Two grades in the same family shrink differently once a filler is involved, so a grade change after the tool is cut is a tool change. Nominate the grade on the drawing, not the family.

Regrind

Runners and rejected parts can be granulated and blended back into virgin material. We keep regrind to a modest fraction and state the percentage on the order, because each pass through the barrel shortens the polymer chains and costs impact strength. Where a part is safety-critical, medical, or food-contact, we run virgin material only. Tell us at inquiry stage if regrind is prohibited, because it affects the piece price.

Tolerances

Molded plastic tolerance is governed by DIN 16742, which sets tolerance groups by material and dimension rather than a single number. Shrinkage varies by resin, by fill, and by direction of flow, so a tolerance that is routine in POM may be impossible in PP on the same geometry.

  • Low-shrink, unfilled resins such as ABS, PC, and POM hold the tightest tolerances.
  • High-shrink resins such as PP and PE, and filled grades with anisotropic shrinkage, hold the loosest.
  • Dimensions across the parting line are always looser than dimensions within one half of the tool, because they include the clamp.
  • Tolerance stacks with part size. A percentage-based deviation on a 300 mm part is a large absolute number.
  • Call out only the features that carry a fit or a function. Applying a tight block to a whole drawing raises price without improving the part.
  • For anything critical, tool steel can be cut "steel safe" and adjusted after first samples. It is far cheaper to remove steel than to add it.
MaterialDIN 16742 groupTolerance at 100 mm
POMTG5±0.20 mm
PCTG5±0.20 mm
ABSTG6±0.28 mm
PA66TG7±0.36 mm
PA66-GF30TG7 to TG8±0.36 to ±0.52 mm
PPTG8±0.52 mm

Use this to size a drawing before you send it. Anything tighter than the group figure is achievable on individual features, but it is a cavity-design decision and it is priced as one, so nominate the few dimensions that matter rather than tightening the whole part.

Surface finishes

The tool surface is transferred to every part, so finish is a tooling decision made before steel is cut, not a post-process. The SPI standard is the common reference; VDI 3400 and Mold-Tech are used for textures.

FinishDescriptionTypical use
SPI A1 to A3Diamond buffed, high glossLenses, light pipes, cosmetic gloss surfaces
SPI B1 to B3Paper polished, semi-glossGeneral cosmetic surfaces, painted parts
SPI C1 to C3Stone finished, matteNon-cosmetic surfaces, internal parts
SPI D1 to D3Bead or grit blasted, textured matteHides sink and flow marks, grip surfaces
VDI 3400EDM textures on a numbered scaleRepeatable engineering textures
Mold-TechEtched pattern texturesLeather grains, geometric patterns, consumer housings

Higher gloss requires more draft, not less. A polished vertical wall will drag on ejection where a matte one would release. Textured surfaces need roughly one additional degree of draft per 0.025 mm of texture depth.

as machinedRa 3.2 fine machinedRa 1.6 polishedRa 0.4 opticalRa 0.05 each step up is another operation, and the cost is not linear Surface finish

Finish is specified as a roughness average, and each grade is a separate operation rather than a setting on the previous one. A cosmetic or sealing surface earns a tight number. Everywhere else, the finish left by the process that made the part is usually adequate and free.

Design rules that decide cost

  • Keep wall thickness uniform. Typically 1.0 to 3.0 mm for engineering resins, thinner for polyolefins, packaging in PP runs to 0.5 mm, and up to 4 or 5 mm on structural glass-filled parts. Variation above about 25 percent causes sink, warp, and voids.
  • Add draft to every face parallel to the direction of pull. One degree is a working minimum on smooth surfaces, three or more on textures.
  • Radius internal corners at roughly 0.5 times the wall thickness. Sharp corners concentrate stress and restrict flow.
  • Size ribs at 40 to 60 percent of the adjoining wall where the opposite face is cosmetic, and up to 70 percent where it is not. Thicker ribs pull sink marks on the visible face opposite.
  • Support bosses with ribs or gussets rather than thickening them. A thick boss is a sink mark waiting to happen.
  • Avoid undercuts where you can. Each one needs a side action or lifter, which adds tool cost and cycle time.
  • Place gates on the thickest section, feeding thick to thin, and away from cosmetic faces. Gate position determines where weld lines land.
  • Plan ejector pin locations early. They leave witness marks, and those marks have to go somewhere non-critical.

Secondary operations

  • Pad printing and screen printing for logos and legends
  • Laser marking and engraving, including date and lot codes
  • Painting, including soft-touch and EMI shielding coatings
  • Ultrasonic welding and heat staking for assemblies
  • Heat-set and ultrasonic threaded insert installation
  • In-mold labelling and in-mold decoration
  • Assembly, kitting, and packaging to your specification

What drives lead time

Tooling dominates the schedule on any new part. Production runs afterwards are short by comparison.

  • Design for manufacture review and quotation, before any steel is committed
  • Tool design and your approval of the layout, which is the last cheap point to change anything
  • Tool build: rough machining, EDM, polishing, and fitting
  • First article sampling (T0), measurement, and any tool adjustment
  • Approval and production release

Lead times are quoted per part rather than averaged: tool build, first article, and production release are three separate dates on the quotation.

clampinjectpack and holdcoolopen and eject 15%55%12% cooling dominates, and it scales with the square of wall thickness Where the cycle time goes

A typical unfilled thermoplastic cycle. Injection itself is a second or two. Cooling is the majority of the cycle and is governed by the thickest section of the part, which is why wall thickness drives piece price more than any other geometric choice.

Quality and documentation

What ships with the parts matters as much as the parts on a regulated or automotive program. Documentation is agreed before the order, not requested afterwards.

  • First article inspection report against your drawing
  • Dimensional report on sampled parts from the production run
  • Material certificates traceable to resin grade and lot
  • Process capability study (Cpk) on nominated critical dimensions
  • PPAP submission where the program requires it

Certificates and their scope are supplied with the quotation for the program they apply to.

Let’s get started on your part

Send your CAD files and target volumes. We come back with a price, a lead time, and any design notes that would reduce either.

Message us on WhatsApp →